Turkish delight: House fails to vote on Armenian genocide resolution
The "Lame Duck" Congress did a great deal, yes, but unfortunately it did not pass -- and did not even vote on -- a resolution by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Cal.) recognizing the 1915-17 massacre of about 1.5 million Armenians at the hands of the Turks for what it was: genocide.
As you may know, Turkey, along with its agents in the U.S. (including the Congressional Turkish Caucus), has waged a massive campaign to revise history and silence anyone who would dare call it genocide. That word, it seems, is just too much -- even if it's absolutely the right word to use.
This campaign has been waged around the world, but in the U.S. what Turkey wants it to block Congress from passing any such resolution and the president from saying genocide. So much so that it has threatened diplomatic reprisals.
Various resolutions have made their way out of committee in recent years, but thus far no resolution has been passed. And Obama has thus far refrained from saying genocide.
The pressure from Turkey and the concern over U.S.-Turkish relations have no doubt trumped any other considerations. In this case, as The Hill reports, "Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan sent Obama a letter Monday
asking him to prevent the vote, warning that it could damage ties
between the two countries." Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu also pressured Hillary Clinton.
I have written about this issue -- the Armenian genocide and the failure to recognize it as such -- a few times already:
-- Genocidal denial: Bush, Turkey, and the Armenian Holocaust (Oct. 2007)
-- Genocide is genocide: Exposing the truth about the Turkish massacre of Armenians (Mar. 2010); and
-- Anything but genocide: Obama, Turkey, and the Armenian Holocaust (Apr. 2010).
What happened was genocide. What is going on now, almost a century later, is still a despicable cover-up. I repeat what I wrote in the third of the posts listed above:
While I suspect that Obama [and Nancy Pelosi, too, who refused to bring Schiff's resolution to a vote] knows full well that it was genocide, and that the Turks are, on this issue, a nation of collective revisionists (and liars), he is effectively contributing to the Turkish campaign, perpetuating Turkey's massive lie, taking Turkey's side against efforts in Congress to call it genocide, and all because he wants to avoid annoying the Turks and risking... what?
Yes, what exactly? Is he afraid that Ankara won't return his phone calls? Is Turkey such an essential ally that it must be appeased no matter what? Would Turkey really refuse to do business with the U.S. and/or support U.S. foreign policy if Obama actually took a firm stand and called it genocide? Sure, the Turks would whine and complain and threaten to sever diplomatic ties, as they've done before (even over non-binding committee resolutions in the House of Representatives), but so what? Does anyone honestly think Turkey can do without America? Please.Honestly, I wish the president would pull a Jon Stewart and tell the Turks to go fuck themselves.Diplomatically, of course.
Just call it genocide. And stop helping Turkey get away with it.
Labels: Armenia, Barack Obama, genocide, history, Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey
1 Comments:
Thank you for your article on your blogsite. Your analysis is accurate, everybody knows it was genocide, yet the 'game' of nullification still goes on.
By Anonymous, at 2:08 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home