Monday, October 06, 2008

On McCain watch --

By Carol Gee

Presidential candidate, Senator John McCain bears watching. His behavior seems increasingly questionable for a potential leader. Recent news items come to mind, such as the one about the McCain Meltdown* from the Des Moines Register, and Frank Rich's New York Times Op-Ed column (9/27/08), "McCain's Suspension bridge to nowhere#." To quote:
The question is why would a man who forever advertises his own honor toy so selfishly with our national interest at a time of crisis. I’ll leave any physiological explanations to gerontologists — if they can get hold of his complete medical records — and any armchair psychoanalysis to the sundry McCain press acolytes who have sorrowfully tried to rationalize his erratic behavior this year. The other answers, all putting politics first, can be found by examining the 24 hours before he decided to “suspend” campaigning and swoop down on the Capitol to save America from the Sunnis or the Shia, or whoever perpetrated all those credit-default swaps.

There was no suspension of his campaign. His surrogates and ads remained on television. Huffington Post bloggers, working the phones, couldn’t find a single McCain campaign office that had gone on hiatus. This “suspension” ruse was an exact replay of McCain’s self-righteous “suspension” of the G.O.P. convention as Hurricane Gustav arrived on Labor Day. “We will put aside our political hats and put on our American hats,” he declared then, solemnly pledging that conventioneers would help those in need. But as anyone in the Twin Cities could see, the assembled put on their party hats instead, piling into the lobbyists’ bacchanals earlier than scheduled, albeit on the down-low.

. . . It’s that utter power vacuum that gave McCain the opening to pull his potentially catastrophic display of economic “leadership” last week. He may be the first presidential candidate in our history to risk wrecking the country even before being voted into the Oval Office.
"Is there a psychological explanation for John McCain’s recent behavior?" This was a fascinating article in the Democratic Strategist on a possible psychological diagnosis for John McCain. HT also to betmo for this link and post in Roger Ebert's column. To quote:

You made a TV commercial showing the moments Obama agreed with you.
Everybody knows he did. Did his agreement show honesty, or weakness?
It is significant that you said it proved he was not ready to lead.
What is the better leadership quality: (1) Willingness to listen to your opponent, and keep an open mind? (2) Rigidly ignoring him? Which of the two of you better demonstrated the bipartisan spirit you say you represent? Was there anything he said that you agreed with? Could you have brought yourself to say so?

I'm not the only one who noticed your odd, hostile behavior. Just about everybody did. I'm sure many of your supporters must have sensed the tension. Before the debate, pundits were wondering if you might explode in a display of your famous temper. I think we saw that happen, all right, but it was an implosion. I have instructed my wife to exclude you from any future dinner parties.

A few nuts and bolts of the presidential campaign also bear watching:
  • McCain and Obama's ads are equally negative, according to Neilsen's, the raters.
  • The states that have been the recipients of the most negative advertising are Ohio and Michigan.
  • McCain's fate hangs on three states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin or Minnesota.
  • From Congressional Quarterly (9/25): Hillary Clinton voters say McCain would do a better job than Obama on terrorism by a narrow 32 percent to 25 percent, AP reports."
Homeland Security -- This from my CQ Behind the Lines newsletter is a very good reminder of scary possibilities for bad stuff to happen as a result of erratic behavior by a president:

Poly-tics: “One of the most remarkable aspects of this campaign has been how little attention has been focused on homeland security,” Julian Zelizer writes for The History Network, suggesting pertinent questions for Friday’s debate. “What Americans often fail to comprehend is that the [post-9/11] powers amassed by President Bush will not expire when he leaves office. They will be available to future presidents to use — and abuse,” John Whitehead explores in American Chronicle. “What we want to do is try to describe what the world will look like to the new president and consider how each candidate is likely to respond to the world,” Stratfor’s George Friedman writes in the first of four parts posted by Global Oracle. “Are we fighting a real war against Islamist terrorist regimes and movements . . . Or is terrorism just a criminal justice problem?” Clifford D. May poses in The Minneapolis Star Tribune as one of several key questions for candidates.

A few more tidbits -- These additional leads come from CQ Behind the Lines (9/23/08) --To quote:

DHS has not talked to either the Democratic or Republican campaigns for president regarding the homeland transition next January, drawing the ire of top members of Congress, Homeland Security Today’s Mickey McCarter mentions.
. . . Poly-ticks: “A majority of Americans think the United States isn’t winning the war on terrorism, a perception that could undermine a key Republican strength,” a McClatchy Newspapers poll finds. Like other voters, Arab Americans’ “deep dissatisfaction” with the Bush administration’s performance has prompted a shift from the GOP and toward the Dems, pollster James Zogby writes in Abu Dhabi’s The National.

Watch what those who should be supporters are saying about the candidate. For example, A Colorado Evangelical leader, Richard Cizik, has criticized John McCain for lack of principle# regarding climate change. And I conclude with this paragraph that perfectly summarizes my post's points. To quote Mitchell Bard# at The Huffington Post,

The 2008 election is about which candidate's view of governing America you want to buy into. McCain and Palin have demonstrated, through their behavior, that they will govern like Bush, not just in their policy beliefs, but, like Bush, with a greater interest in political gain than serving the American people. If you enjoyed living with the consequences of Bush's philosophy of government, then you'll love four years under the boots of McCain and Palin.

Reference: "A Visual Guide to the Nominees' Speeches," by Dan Nguyen at ProPublica.

Hat Tip Key: Regular contributors of links to leads are "betmo*" and Jon#.

(Cross-posted at South by Southwest.)

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

3 Comments:

  • well, things are getting worse for the 'team of mavericks'- folks in alaska apparently, don't like to be embarrassed:

    papers filed against mccain for interfering with troopergate

    http://christian-dem-in-nc.dailykos.com/

    and the obama/biden rally was bigger than the mccain/palin rally--- in anchorage

    http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/04/mccain-palin-rally-vs-obama-biden-rally-in-anchorage-the-blow-by-blow/

    By Blogger billie, at 6:24 PM  

  • Thank goodness you are on watch, too, betmo. I will check out this good news from Alaska. This will be decided soon, and I am ready. I will vote early, BTW.

    By Blogger Carol Gee, at 7:37 AM  

  • (法新社倫敦四日電) 英國情色大亨芮孟的公司a片下載昨天說,芮孟日前成人光碟去世,享壽八十二歲;這位身價上億的房地產a片開發商,曾經在倫敦推出第一場脫成人電影衣舞表成人影片演。


    a片下載孟的財產估計達六億五千萬英鎊情色電影(台部落格幣將近四百億),由於他名下事業大多分布在倫情色電影敦夜生活區蘇成人活區,因此擁有「蘇活之sex王」的稱號。
    av女優
    部落格
    他的公部落格司「保羅芮孟集團成人影片」旗下發a片行多種情色雜誌成人電影,包括「Raav女優zzle」、「男性世成人網站界」色情影片以及「M色情ayfair」成人


    芮孟本名傑福瑞.安東尼.奎恩情色,父親為搬運承包商。芮孟十五歲離開學校,矢言成人影片要在表演av事業留avav,起先色情a片表演讀心術,後來成為巡迴歌舞雜耍表演的a片製作人。


    許多評論家日本av認為,他把情色表演帶進主流社會情色,一九五九年主持破天荒的脫衣色情舞表演,後來更靠著在蘇活a片區與倫敦西成人網站區開色情發房地產賺得大筆財成人網站富。
    AV片

    av女優有人情色視訊形容芮孟是英國的海夫納,avavdvd位等同美國的「花花公子」創辦人海夫納。

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:30 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home