More than enough Imus
By Michael J.W. Stickings
Updating this post, Imus has been fired by CBS.
Good riddance. (Was it the time of your life?)
Although I still think the story has been revoltingly overblown, although I think the Rutgers players would have been better off telling him to go fuck off than contributing to the story, and although I defend Imus's right to speak his mind and generally reject efforts to censor speech, this has been my preferred outcome all along.
But what of CBS? Just like MSNBC, and more so, it was more than happy to profit off Imus's popularity as long as it could. And that means it was more than willing to put up with his bigotry while the money was rolling in. Imus is the bad guy here, but that tells us a lot about how the media operate. It's not about principle, it's about profit. (No revelation there, I admit.)
On CNN this evening, Jack Cafferty, whom I generally like, defended Imus as a great interviewer, noted that everyone wanted to be on his show, as if that excuses him, and suggested that this whole sordid episode would get America talking about race again.
How ridiculous. This isn't about race or even racism. It's about, as I've said before, a stupid man who, once more, said a stupid thing. And he's gotten what was coming to him. At long last.
Free speech is a foundational element of liberal democracy. And there are many like Imus, and much worse than Imus, out there on the airwaves, unleashing their venom, maybe even trying to be funny about it. But Imus was one of the big ones and the platform from which he could speak freely was as prominent as they come.
Let's hope that his replacement -- who (of course) should be allowed to speak freely even by media conglomerates that put self-interest before individual rights and the public good -- isn't racist or sexist.
Is that too much to ask?
Updating this post, Imus has been fired by CBS.
Good riddance. (Was it the time of your life?)
Although I still think the story has been revoltingly overblown, although I think the Rutgers players would have been better off telling him to go fuck off than contributing to the story, and although I defend Imus's right to speak his mind and generally reject efforts to censor speech, this has been my preferred outcome all along.
But what of CBS? Just like MSNBC, and more so, it was more than happy to profit off Imus's popularity as long as it could. And that means it was more than willing to put up with his bigotry while the money was rolling in. Imus is the bad guy here, but that tells us a lot about how the media operate. It's not about principle, it's about profit. (No revelation there, I admit.)
On CNN this evening, Jack Cafferty, whom I generally like, defended Imus as a great interviewer, noted that everyone wanted to be on his show, as if that excuses him, and suggested that this whole sordid episode would get America talking about race again.
How ridiculous. This isn't about race or even racism. It's about, as I've said before, a stupid man who, once more, said a stupid thing. And he's gotten what was coming to him. At long last.
Free speech is a foundational element of liberal democracy. And there are many like Imus, and much worse than Imus, out there on the airwaves, unleashing their venom, maybe even trying to be funny about it. But Imus was one of the big ones and the platform from which he could speak freely was as prominent as they come.
Let's hope that his replacement -- who (of course) should be allowed to speak freely even by media conglomerates that put self-interest before individual rights and the public good -- isn't racist or sexist.
Is that too much to ask?
Labels: civil liberties, media, talk radio



3 Comments:
Well said! I'd also ask that his replacement not be so homophobic as well. But that is, I suppose, my own selfish interests.
I agree with everything you said. I always thought the guy was a jerk and deserved what he got. The only thing that really irks me though (and this is true with most people like Imus), is that he's very free to go on making very derogatory comments about gays, without any action against him, even from the likes of Rev. Sharpton. It bothers me a bit that he was canned over race, when there was so much more to it than that.
But, I do understand it. It is still perfectly acceptable to bash gays on the airwaves these days.
Aside from that, I share your concerns over freedom of speech. How do we balance that, and where is the line drawn? I hate a lot of the things Imus said, but he had the right to say them. But Rev. Sharpton is now arguing (and organizing demonstrations) that the "public airwaves" should be free of this kind of speech. I think that is a very dangerous path to go down.
If this is all about money, let the market determine what can be said, not the speech police. If people don't like what the jerk is saying, change to a different channel, but preserve free speech.
By
Bill, at 3:17 PM
mirc
mirç
mırc
mırç
mircturk
turkmirc
turkiyemirc
mircturkiye
mirch
mırch
mirc indir
mirc yükle
mirc yukle
mırc indir
mırc yukle
mirc turkiye
turkiye mirc
turk mirc
mirc turk
türkçe mirc
türkce mirc
türkçe mırc
turkce mirc
turkçe mirc
turkçe mırc
turkce mirc
mirc chat
mirc sohbet
mirc ara
muhabbet
chat
blog
muhabbet
ircforum
mirc forum
forum
forum
turkiyeforum
türk forum
mirc
mircturk
turkmirc
mirc indir
sohbet
chat
bedava sohbet
turksohbet
turkiye sohbet
sohbet odaları
bedava chat
chat odaları
türk chat
türkiye chat
turkada
turkmirc
mirc inndir
karar
sohbet
chat
bedava sohbet
bedava chat
sohbet odalari
turkiye sohbet
sohbet et
sohbet chat
sohpet
çet
cet
sohbet sitesi
By
ali sahin, at 10:04 AM
mirc
mırc
mırç
mircturk
turkmirc
mirc indir
mırc indir
mirç indir
mirc yükle
mırc yükle
mirc yukle
mırc yukle
mirch
mırch
mirc turk
turk mirc
mırc turk
mircada
mircturkiye
muhabbet
mirc sohbet
mırc sohbet
mirc chat
mırc chat
mırc ındır
mirc ındır
türkçe mirc
turkce mirc
turkçe mırc
turkce mırc
By
Mehmet, at 7:45 AM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home