The rise and fall of the Bush presidency
According to E.J. Dionne, in a provocative column in today's Post, the Bush Era is over:
The Bush Era, if it may be called that, began on September 14, when Bush stood upon the wreckage of the World Trade Center and launched the so-called War on Terror. He "[identified] enemies and [rallied] a nation already disposed to action," and "[v]ery nearly all of us rallied behind him".
But... well, you know the rest of the story. The War on Terror metamorphosed into the War in Iraq, and that hasn't gone well. There were those excessive tax cuts "for his wealthiest supporters". There was the botched attempt to privatize social security. There was the sluggish economy. There were the massive budget deficits and a booming national debt. And Iraq kept getting worse and more Americans were dying in the streets of Baghdad and Fallujah and all around that occupied land. There was the partisanship. All that nasty partisanship from a man who claimed, arrogantly and erroneously, to be a uniter, not a divider. And then there was Katrina:
Dionne is one of my favourite pundits, but I'm not sure what to make of this. I agree (mostly) with his assessment of the rise and fall of the Bush presidency. And I agree that Bush is at such a low point in the wake of Katrina that he may not be able to recover. But he has three and a half years left, and three and a half years are a long time in politics. Dionne's on to something, but it may be a bit premature to write Bush off so early in his second term. Just as Katrina brought him low by exposing the hollowness of his leadership, or the lack thereof, some as-yet-unknown event could bring him back up, if not to the level of support and popularity he enjoyed after 9/11, than at least back up to respectability.
Regardless, for those of you who dislike Bush and who have found his presidency to be something of a disaster, take comfort. The Bush era may not quite be over, but it soon will be.
The Bush Era is over. The sooner politicians in both parties realize that, the better for them -- and the country.
Recent months, and especially the past two weeks, have brought home to a steadily growing majority of Americans the truth that President Bush's government doesn't work. His policies are failing, his approach to leadership is detached and self-indulgent, his way of politics has produced a divided, angry and dysfunctional public square. We dare not go on like this...
The Bush Era, if it may be called that, began on September 14, when Bush stood upon the wreckage of the World Trade Center and launched the so-called War on Terror. He "[identified] enemies and [rallied] a nation already disposed to action," and "[v]ery nearly all of us rallied behind him".
But... well, you know the rest of the story. The War on Terror metamorphosed into the War in Iraq, and that hasn't gone well. There were those excessive tax cuts "for his wealthiest supporters". There was the botched attempt to privatize social security. There was the sluggish economy. There were the massive budget deficits and a booming national debt. And Iraq kept getting worse and more Americans were dying in the streets of Baghdad and Fallujah and all around that occupied land. There was the partisanship. All that nasty partisanship from a man who claimed, arrogantly and erroneously, to be a uniter, not a divider. And then there was Katrina:
And so the Bush Era ended definitively on Sept. 2, the day Bush first toured the Gulf Coast States after Hurricane Katrina. There was no magic moment with a bullhorn. The utter failure of federal relief efforts had by then penetrated the country's consciousness. Yesterday's resignation of FEMA Director Michael Brown put an exclamation point on the failure.
The source of Bush's political success was his claim that he could protect Americans. Leadership, strength and security were Bush's calling cards. Over the past two weeks, they were lost in the surging waters of New Orleans.
Dionne is one of my favourite pundits, but I'm not sure what to make of this. I agree (mostly) with his assessment of the rise and fall of the Bush presidency. And I agree that Bush is at such a low point in the wake of Katrina that he may not be able to recover. But he has three and a half years left, and three and a half years are a long time in politics. Dionne's on to something, but it may be a bit premature to write Bush off so early in his second term. Just as Katrina brought him low by exposing the hollowness of his leadership, or the lack thereof, some as-yet-unknown event could bring him back up, if not to the level of support and popularity he enjoyed after 9/11, than at least back up to respectability.
Regardless, for those of you who dislike Bush and who have found his presidency to be something of a disaster, take comfort. The Bush era may not quite be over, but it soon will be.
8 Comments:
A rise and fall? Some of us thought it was simply a continually denoument.
By Anonymous, at 10:59 PM
I have mixed feelings. On one hand, I am not sure his fall in the ratings is a good thing. Admittedly, Bush never connected with me, I never voted for him, and I think his tax/spending priorities are way off base. However, our government works best with a reasonably strong voice leading the way. Otherwise, there are just too many cooks in the kitchen and gridlock rules the day. On the other hand, I sincerely hope that this signals the end of the rise of the far-right agenda pointing the political compass. Clearly, Bush has no more "political capital" to spend, and the GOP is fearful of the '06 midterms. Hopefully, we have seen the last of Fallwell and Dobson on the TV smugly stating their claim to the political mainstream. Perhaps the events of the last few weeks has set the stage for a correction back to moderate politics in the US. We can only hope Mr. Bush can see this as well. OK, wishful thinking :-)
By Anonymous, at 8:31 AM
In most cases a strong leader is good for America. But his particular "leader" is toxic, and the illusion of his strength works to the detriment of America. Gridlock may be a difficult problem in the short term, but it is a good thing in the long term because it will prevent these clowns from damaging the country much more.
By Anonymous, at 8:57 AM
I think it's too early to say that Bush's fall (the end of his era) marks a parallel decline for the far right. And I'm not sure that there will be any kind "correction back to moderate politics". But, anonymous, I appreciate your "wishful thinking".
By Michael J.W. Stickings, at 12:25 AM
The issue at this point is not Bush so much as what will follow Bush. I don't think it's clear that the Democrats will be able to take advantage of Bush's "demise" so to speak. Frankly, so much of what I hear from the Democrats is "we're not Bush" but I don't really see how that us them anywhere. Bush isn't running again so the Dems are going to have to prove that they have a better alternative to the Republicans. Right now, the Democrats probably can keep Bush from implementing his agenda--he was rapidly becoming a lame duck and Katrina just exacerbates his weakness--but what does this portend for the mid-terms next year and 2008. I still don't see the Democrats expounding a coherent message that will resonate with the public.
By Anonymous, at 11:38 AM
Dionne is right on target. Outside of "conservative" talk radio Fox news, no one respects him anymore. He has shown himself to be utterly clueless and incompetent. There will be no Social Security privatization, repeal of the estate tax, or any other regressive economic policies. The reps will have to worry about holding on to Congress in 2006. His welfare will be secondary to their political survival.
By Jack Davis, at 10:36 PM
It would seem by now, that George W. would have been found to have commited impeachable violations, that have gone unchallenged.
Perhaps the administrations strongarm techniques have frightened those who might blow the needed whistles.
By Anonymous, at 12:30 PM
Oyun oyunlar oyun oyna gibi kelimeler toner kartuş konuları yer almakta bedava oyunlar
2 Oyunculu Oyunlar - Yetenek Oyunları - Dövüş Oyunları - Aksiyon Macera Oyunları - Nişancılık Oyunları - Spor Oyunları - Yarış Oyunları - Zeka Hafıza Oyunları - oyun çocukta doğuştan gelen bir tabiat ve Allah'ın onda yarattığı bir içgüdüdür. Bunun temelinde çocuğun fiziksel gelişiminin mükemmel bir tarzda gelişimdirMotor Oyunları - Mario Oyunları - Savaş Oyunları - Strateji Taktik Oyunları - Yemek Pişirme Oyunları - Dekor Oyunları - Boyama Kitabı Oyunları - 3 Boyutlu Oyunlar - Hugo Oyunları - Sonic Oyunları - Webcam Oyunları - Peri Güzellik Oyunları - Battleon Oyunları - Süper Oyunlar - İlizyon Oyunları - Komik Oyunlar - Teletabi Oyunları - Giysi Giydirme oyunları - Makyaj yapma oyunları -çocuğun en özenli işidir. Yetişkin için iş ve kazanç ne ise onun için de oyun odur... Dış dünyanın kavranılması öğrenilmesi ve hayata hazırlanmanın en ... Kız oyunları - Çocuk Oyunları - işletme oyunları - varmısın yokmusun - Bebek Oyunları - Oyun - Animasyon - Oyun Oyna - Oyunlar - Oyun Cambazı - Bedava Oyunlar - motosiklet dergisi - animasyon - renkli toner tozları - fotokopi toneri - kartuş - toner - boş toner - boş kartuş - toner dram - toner chip - toner tozu - toner dolumu - kartuş dolumu - kartuş dolum malzemeleri - kartuş dolum makinesi - renkli toner dolumu - Bedava Oyun - Kral oyun
haber
By cicicocuk, at 7:02 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home