Monday, November 19, 2012

Jonah Goldberg calls for more lying

By Frank Moraes

Jonah Goldberg has written the kind of article that liberals just love, "Compassionate Conservatism Redux." In it, he admits that this election has taught him a valuable lesson: as much as he and the other evil men at National Review may love their "Give me low tax rates and give them death" ideology, they need a kinder, a gentler conservatism if they are going to convince the rubes to vote for them. And what is the kinder, gentler conservatism? Certainly not George Bush Sr. He wants to take us back to George Bush Jr. and his idea of "compassionate conservatism."

Quick: what made Bush's conservatism compassionate? Bmmpth! You couldn't think of it quickly, because he never actually governed that way. But let's go back to the way that he claimed he would govern. Goldberg reminds us:

People forget that Bush was elected during the [post-Cold War period] and had the [War on Terror] thrust upon him. But at the end of the 1990s, he was one of many voices on the right trying to craft a political rationale to deal with the changing electoral and demographic landscape. He campaigned on a "humble foreign policy" in 2000 and promised something very, very different from a "leave me alone" domestic policy.

Let's see here: would a man who cared about, say, seniors, pass a law that was first and foremost a giveaway to drug companies? Would a man planning on a "humble foreign policy" have Dick Cheney as vice president? It doesn't really matter. The truth is that I have no memory of a Republican ever governing based upon his campaign. Sure: they all promise tax cuts and they almost always pass them. But other stuff? Not really. Remember Reagan? Remember how terrible the federal deficit was and how he was going to knock it out with those three 10-percentage-point tax cuts? I do.

When a Republican promises something like fiscal restraint or human compassion, I know they are lying. So when Jonah Goldberg says that the Republicans need to revisit "compassionate conservatism," what he means is that they need to sound more compassionate. And once in office, they can devastate the poor and start a bunch of new wars. In other words, what Goldberg is really saying is that he's been too honest in the past.

(Cross-posted at Frankly Curious.)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share


  • Flabby assed, puffy face Jonah is one of those wingnut welfare recepients whose never done a day's worth of labor in his life, who inherited his position from his mommie, who was a chicken hawk coward only to ready to send other men off to multi-deployments while he waxed on about Give War a Chance.

    So, Jonah can shove it up his large posterior...

    By Blogger Grung_e_Gene, at 3:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home