Playing politics with the Tucson tragedy
Nobody
doubted the depth of denial that would gush from Rush Limbaugh's radio
studio following the murderous rampage in Tucson this weekend. The "vitriol in politics" became a primary focus of the national media almost immediately after the news of the shooting broke.
Those who had made references to "second amendment remedies" and "firing machine guns" and "violent revolution"
were targeted for contributing to the hate-filled rhetoric that has
marked the past two years of political discourse. Having defended most
of the Tea Party and Fox News celebrities who led the march against
Democrats in November by riling their base and inciting the masses to
join this new wave of "activism," Limbaugh, among many others, was put
on the defensive.
Before
his broadcast, I ignorantly maintained a sliver of hope that as one of
America's most popular political personalities, Limbaugh would join the
bipartisan movement to condemn both the savage murders and the extremism
that has taken over this country. Instead, he demonstrated general
ignorance of mass media's influence by denying the persuasive power of
celebrities and excused the tone of politics by pointing fingers at the "liberal" media for "politicizing" the Tucson shooting as some sort of
bizarrely-contrived Democratic conspiracy.
The
attempted assassination of a politician is as political as it gets, but
a Democratic Congresswoman taking a 9-mm bullet in the head at
point-blank range wasn't enough to deter the almighty Limbaugh from
accusing the left of political opportunism.
In a rant
that should be remembered only in the history archives of national
radio as the beginning of a giant's end, Limbaugh lambasted the left for
capitalizing on a tragedy and criminalizing all Americans by
anticipating the assassination as a means for pushing through a
political agenda.
"I guarantee you," he said, "that somewhere in a desk drawer in Washington, D.C., someplace, in an FCC bureaucrat's office or some place,
the government machinery will be in place to take away as many
political freedoms as they can manage on the left. They already have it
in place... just waiting for the right event for a clampdown. They have
been trying this ever since the Oklahoma City bombing."
He continued:
Here you have a 22-year-old kid, a dopehead – marijuana – just genuinely insane. Irrational. And the first thought – the desperate hope that the losers in November of 2010 had – was that they could revitalize their political fortunes because of this unfortunate shooting of a Congresswoman in Arizona. That was the most important thing to them, and that to me is sick. You know that they were rubbing hands together. You know that they were e-mailing and calling each other on the phone saying, "Ah-ha, this might be the one. This might be the one where we can officially tie it to these guys and shut them up and shut 'em down." They want you to believe that sadness was on the order of the day, and I'm sure it was, but... they couldn't help themselves. They just couldn't help themselves. [Emphasis added.]
Not surprisingly, Limbaugh was short on the details of exactly how
Democrats would go about utilizing this event for their own political
ends. But thankfully, there is such a thing as daily news to pin facts
to the allegations made by the pill-popping millionaires on the right
who see nothing but conspiracies in every gesture of every Democrat in
the country.
According to The Hill,
the first freedom attacked by the left is the right to use violent
language against elected officials. After waiting more than a decade for
a right-wing nut to shoot a bullet through the brain of a politically
moderate member of Congress, Democrats finally had the opportunity to go
for the jugular of America's constitutionally protected political
liberties. So what did they do?
They
proposed a bill – like socialistic opportunists will – that would make
it a federal offense to use language or symbols that threaten or incite
violence against a member of Congress or a federal official – a
protection, it should be noted, that is already provided to the
president.
The
alleged aim of this proposed legislation is to quell the violent
language that has become so common in American politics, but below the
surface it's pretty obvious that Democrats are targeting right-wingers,
Tea Partiers, and extremist conservatives in general – "to shut them up and shut 'em down," just as Limbaugh predicted.
The
second "political freedom" Democrats are seeking to revoke is the right
to carry high-capacity magazines like the one used by the Tucson
shooter this weekend. This law actually isn't new; it was in place for a
decade but expired in 2004. After seeing one man gun down twenty people
in a matter of seconds with a clip that would have been illegal six
years ago, Democratic lawmakers in D.C. thought it might be timely to
re-implement the ban.
"The
only reason to have 33 bullets loaded in a handgun is to kill a lot of
people very quickly," Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said in a statement
Monday, according to The Hill. "Before 2004, these ammunition clips were banned, and they must be banned again."
What
they're really doing is taking our guns away, and Republicans will see
to it that this doesn't happen – as they did in 2008 when Democrats
proposed a reauthorization bill. It died in committee.
And
lastly, what Democrat-imposed unraveling of the Constitution would be
complete without the infringement on First Amendment rights?
According
to several news reports, the Arizona state legislature is giving the
federal judicial system the finger by going against an appeals court
ruling last year that upheld the First Amendment rights of church
members in Kansas who had taken to protesting funerals of military
service members.
The
congregants of Westboro Baptist Church believe any unnatural death is
the manifestation of God's wrath against American society for its
tolerance of homosexuality. They planned to protest the funeral of
9-year-old Christina Green, one of the six victims of Saturday's
shooting, but will be unable to now, as the state legislature has barred Westboro from coming within 300 feet of the funeral.
God
sent a "soldier veteran" to Tucson on Saturday, Rev. Fred Phelps said
in a YouTube.com video posted after the shooting. "Congresswoman [Gabrielle] Giffords, an avid supporter of sin and baby killing, was
shot for that mischief... God avenged himself on you today, by a
marvelous work in Tucson. He sits in the heavens and laughs at you and
your affliction. Westboro prays for more shooters, more violent
veterans, and more dead. Praise god for his righteous judgments in his
Earth. Amen."
It
is truly sickening... how far Democrats are willing to go in order to
push their agenda down the throats of America's patriots.
This
is what "democracy" is all about for liberals – violating "political
freedoms" by denying people the right to threaten an elected official,
banning assault weapon magazines, and stomping on the First Amendment
rights of church-going Kansans who want to picket the funerals of
victims killed in a failed political assassination.
This
is what Democrats do when they lose midterm elections – they upend the
Constitution and attempt to unravel the very fabric of this country in
order to "revitalize their political fortunes" by capitalizing on
tragedy.
Labels: Arizona shooting, Christian fundamentalism, conservatives, political violence, right-wing extremism, Rush Limbaugh
3 Comments:
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/jared-loughners-friend-says-suspect-did-not-watch-tv-disliked-the-news_b48040
By Anonymous, at 2:15 PM
We shall see. Again, the point isn't that there was a direct causal connection between, say, the Tea Party and the shooting, it's that the shooting happened not in a vacuum but within a certain socio-political context, so much of which has been shaped by right-wing ideology.
By Michael J.W. Stickings, at 6:05 PM
Nobody outside of the crackpots within the loony left blogosphere has blamed Palin for the murders, even after she put the target of the assassination, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), in crosshairs during the midterm campaigns. Nobody outwardly blamed the candidates during the midterm election who called on their Tea Party supporters to “fire machine guns” and consider “Second Amendment solutions” to the problems facing America.
Palin and Beck and Allen West and Sharron Angle did not tell Loughner to shoot Giffords in the face, and nobody has claimed such. What the critics are saying is that there are consequences to inciting the masses by using violent, hate-filled language to attack political opponents and policies, to call people racists and traitors and terrorists and tyrants merely because they govern based on a value system that is not conservative.
Forty five percent of Americans believe Loughner was neither right nor left – that he was driven by his own political views. But no one’s political views are developed in a vacuum. There are influences. Those who hold the biggest microphones have the greatest responsibility. And when an alleged crazy person shoots 20 people in a supermarket parking lot, targeting a member of Congress, having a dialogue about the tone of political discourse is necessary.
By Muddy Politics, at 5:55 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home