New Hampshire Senate votes for same-sex marriage
By Michael J.W. Stickings
It wasn't a decisive vote -- just 13-11 for legislation that includes legal protections for anti-gay religious groups -- but it's nothing if not a step in the right direction in a state that, while generally libertarian, is fairly red. (The House passed similar legislation last month.)
While I think that same-sex marriage is a right that can and ought to be articulated by the courts, when necessary, it is refreshing to see democratic legislatures, as opposed to appointed judges, leading the way.
Anti-gay bigotry is alive and well across the land, of course, but it is pretty clear where the country is headed.
It wasn't a decisive vote -- just 13-11 for legislation that includes legal protections for anti-gay religious groups -- but it's nothing if not a step in the right direction in a state that, while generally libertarian, is fairly red. (The House passed similar legislation last month.)
While I think that same-sex marriage is a right that can and ought to be articulated by the courts, when necessary, it is refreshing to see democratic legislatures, as opposed to appointed judges, leading the way.
Anti-gay bigotry is alive and well across the land, of course, but it is pretty clear where the country is headed.
Labels: New Hampshire, same-sex marriage
3 Comments:
亲我的屁股, 干你娘!
By Capt. Fogg, at 9:28 AM
你可以選擇來自來自 B 欄的 A 欄和 一個 欄的一個,以六你得到蛋捲餅。
By Mustang Bobby, at 6:20 PM
Do I get egg rolls if I order from column A?
By Capt. Fogg, at 8:08 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home