Friday, November 02, 2007

No child's left behind unspanked?

By Carl

Simply Left Behind: The 2007 Weblog Awards


**********

Given the way Michelle Malkin and other Orcs of the Right Wing went after those two kids who made commercials in favor of SCHIP, do you think they'll spend a moment trying to track down the identity of the kid who caused the single most destructive fire in American history?

Minutes after the fire broke out, Conner said, she had raced up a hill toward the source of the flames. At the top, she saw a stunned-looking 10-year-old boy and his parents frantically trying to beat the flames down with towels.

"There's no reason to talk to other people," Conner, a horse trainer at the ranch where the fire started, recalled telling arson investigators. "You need to go straight up the road and talk to that boy."

The 10-year-old quickly admitted he had been playing with matches.

On Thursday, as authorities considered whether to file criminal charges, neighbors gave conflicting accounts of the boy's behavior.

Denise Tomey, who runs the Carousel Ranch where the boy lived in a small trailer with his family, described him as a quiet child who often played outside with his brother and the family's small white and tan dog, Spike.

"From what I know, he's a good kid," said Tomey, executive director of the ranch, which provides riding lessons to developmentally disabled children. The boy's father tends horses there and the boy attends a nearby school.

"He's a child and I certainly believe that he had no malice, and I absolutely believe it was accidental," Tomey said.

The short answer: No.

Can you say "white Republican offspring"? I knew that you could...

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

7 Comments:

  • We can't tell at all if the boy is a "White Republican offspring." All we know is that he lived in a "small trailer" with his family. This could be anyone. We can't interpret ideology from this.

    By Blogger TorchofLiberty, at 12:40 PM  

  • Carl, no offense, but I think this post is overly harsh and over the top, and torchofliberty is quite correct in pointing out the logical fallacy of making an unwarrented assumption about the presumed political affiliation of a boy's family.

    WIth respect to the legal culpability of the boy, that remains to be determined. Generally, children are not held accountable because they are considered too young to understand the difference between right and wrong according to law, UNLESS some form of sociopathy is observed. The analogue for sociopathy among children is Oppositional Defiant Disorder.

    A child perceived as a "good kid" would not meet this definition.

    Sometimes curious children DO play with matches, and their behavior is no different than a spark, a lightening bolt or other act of nature. At best, parents may be held accountable for criminal negligence but it would be very difficult to make more of this case.

    I am not dismissing the terrible loss of life and property, but this post is an over-reaction.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:28 PM  

  • I think we can draw a few conclusions.

    1) If the family were comprised of illegal immigrants, then the neighbors interviewed would have said other, different things about the boy and particularly his family.

    2) Orange County and its environs is not precisely a hot bed of ethnicity, particularly in horse country.

    3) Ranch hands tend to be white, in America. There ain't many vaqueros here.

    Could I be wrong? You bet. I wouldn't count on it, tho.

    By Blogger Carl, at 3:44 PM  

  • Immaterial.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:39 PM  

  • In your opinion.

    Some of us might consider this to be a skewer of Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin.

    Put it this way: it's clear that the on-the-ground reporters know who this kid is.

    Ergo, it's safe to say that Malkin could easily find out who the kid is.

    IF this kid was anything but a white Republican from Orange County, she'd raise the alarm, and Glenn Beck would fire the first shot.

    The silence from the right is deafening.

    QED

    By Blogger Carl, at 6:10 PM  

  • And doesn't Fox owe us some apology for all that nonsense about Al Qaeda in California?

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 6:32 PM  

  • Over-reaching, methinks. Not worth the dive into quicksand. Not all days are good blogging days. Give it up, my friend.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:32 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home