Brown v. Board of Ed. is dead. Long live racial integration.
By Michael J.W. Stickings
Chief Justice John Roberts insists that the Supreme Court did not overturn the landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling from 1954, but, honestly, what else are we to make of the Court's 5-4 decision "striking down voluntary integration plans in the public schools of Seattle and Louisville," as Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSblog puts it? (See also the Post.)
I tend to be liberal on issues of race, that is, against race-oriented public policy, but Roberts's assertion that "[t]he way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race" seems to me to be hopelessly naive. Racial discrimination is not the product of race-oriented, or racialist, public policy. Racial discrimination may or may not be worsened by any given racialist public policy, and racial discrimination ought to be avoided in public policy, but racial discrimination in a more general sense antedates public policy. There is racial segregation not necessarily because racial groups have been legally segregated but because of a complexity of factors including racism itself, the grouping of people by race according to primacy afforded racial identity. And how is such racial segregation to be overcome other than through efforts -- as here, voluntary efforts -- at integration? Do Roberts et al., the Court's right-wing majority (with Kennedy), suppose that the best thing to do is simply to wait -- for eons -- for race and racial (self-)identification to be overcome?
The Times is right, in its editorialization. This is "Resegration Now": "The Supreme Court ruled 53 years ago in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated education is inherently unequal, and it ordered the nation’s schools to integrate. Yesterday, the court switched sides and told two cities that they cannot take modest steps to bring public school students of different races together. It was a sad day for the court and for the ideal of racial equality."
Pre-Brown America, here we come.
**********
For more, see Amanda Marcotte, Scott Lemieux, Taylor Marsh, Jack Balkin, and Christy Hardin Smith.
Labels: conservatives, race, racism, U.S. Supreme Court
3 Comments:
I've never been very comfortable with "affirmative action" or any scheme that allowed the government to segregate us into racial categories, but still, I can't come up with a better plan for school integration.
Did anyone not see this coming?
George Bush has never hidden the fact that he dislikes the social progress that came out of the 60's or the fact that he wanted to turn back the clock. He has never denied that he thought liberal interpretation of the law was wrong. Why are we surprised that he has infected the courts with the same kind of reprobate judges every one of his Republican predecessors has selected?
By this measure alone, his presidency has been a success and I think we make a mistake to think that his party will now turn away from their agenda of promoting this kind of feudalism - the rule of a plutocratic oligarchy.
All along we have had the chance to stop this and our stark stupidity and gullibility is to blame, not Bush.
By Capt. Fogg, at 11:32 AM
To say that this lead to resegregation is ridiculous. In Topkea Kansas, black children were driven past their neighborhood schools to the black schools. In Louisville, white children were driven past their neighborhood school to attend the balanced school because they were white.
The Cities of SEattle and Louisville had separate assignment programs based upon whether the students was white or not. Those programs were discriminatory.
Also, there was nothing voluntary about the programs from the POV of the students. They were forced into bad situations because of their race.
By Superdestroyer, at 1:28 PM
While I live close enough to Seattle to understand their point of view (and that of the comment before me), this ruling still leaves me reeling inside. I grew up a military brat---I saw black children being ferried to school in the back of a pick-up truck in 1964, as I rode on a normal bus. Just as we were assurred that the Patriot Act would ONLY be used to "get them terrorists"....we are now to believe that the reversal of this landmark case will not let bigots re-enact the horrors I called, wrote, and marched to eliminate to begin with....years ago? Must every battle won now be lost?
By Anonymous, at 8:04 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home