The revenge of the moderates
After years in the wilderness, drowned out by the loud voices of extremism, moderates are finally returning to prominence in American politics. Yes, both Bush and Kerry played to the center leading up to last year's presidential election, but they did so largely to try to carve out narrow victories in swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. I have little doubt that both Bush and Kerry are moderates of the center-right and center-left, respectively, however much Bush has been pulled to the right by his evangelical base and neoconservative boosters, but the nature of American politics -- and, in particular, of presidential politics -- is such that both Republican and Democratic candidates tend to play to the more extremist elements in their parties, especially in the primaries. I have already complained vigorously about these "drunk" extremes, and I won't repeat myself here. Suffice it to say that moderates are, finally, as mad as hell. And, hopefully, they're not going to take it anymore. According to E.J. Dionne, in today's Washington Post, what we're witnessing now is a replay of pre-1992, when Perot emerged as a centrist alternative to the left-right stalemate and Clinton successfully ran as a centrist New Democrat, tapping very much into that same sense of middle- of-the-road alienation. Writes Dionne:
- The accepted view in politics is that moderates don't get angry, don't scream and don't demonstrate. Politics these days is said to be dominated by ideological enthusiasts. Moderates are thought of as people who sit on the sidelines and decide which batch of true believers they can most easily live with. But something important has happened since President Bush's inauguration. America's moderates may not be screaming, but they're in revolt. Many who reluctantly supported the president and the Republicans in 2004 are turning away. The party's agenda on Social Security, judges and the Terri Schiavo case is out of touch with where moderate voters stand. Worse for Bush and his party, most moderates have a practical, problem-solving view of government and think these issues are far less important than shoring up a shaky economy and improving living standards.
Is this just a mirage? Maybe. But Bush's problems -- from the failure of his social security privatization scheme (which is going nowhere, fast) to his loss of traction on foreign policy (notice how little is being said about Iraq these days?) to his association with the moral absolutists in Congress (notably in the Schiavo case) to the Democrats' admirable resistance to Republican efforts to do away with the filibuster in the Senate (and thereby push through extremist judicial nominees) -- are real. It was 9/11 and the so-called "war on terror," successfully manipulated to portray Bush as a "war" leader, that allowed Bush to get through a disastrous first term without plunging approval ratings. It was the trumped-up fear of imminent terrorism that won the election for Bush, not "moral values". Who knows? There may be another terrorist attack, or there may be another foreign crisis that can be manipulated to Bush's gain. But it now seems that the honeymoon is finally over. And what we're witnessing is the return of reality-based reality, not the faith-based reality favoured by Bush-pumping ideologues on the right. And the reality-based reality is that most Americans, and especially most moderate Americans who inhabit the silent majority of the center, do not agree with Bush on most core issues. They reject his pandering to the evangelical right, they reject his class warfare, and they finally seem to be realizing that there isn't much going on behind the farce known as the war on terror. Plus, they recoil from the extremism of the Republican Party.
Conservatives like to think that America is a conservative place. It may be, in a sense. I have no doubt that most Americans loathe taxes, prefer smaller, less intrusive government, support their military, reject utopian schemes of both the left and right, and are generally quite proud and patriotic to be American. (Yes, we Canadians could learn a lot from America's conservatism.) But, on the whole, Americans are also tolerant and just, and, in the end, they know bullshit when they smell it. And, right now, Bush and the Republican Party are stinking up Washington with massive budget deficits, a ballooning national debt, highly intrusive government, poorly planned military excursions, chauvenistic unilateralism, and the twin utopian schemes of domestic evangelical theocracy and global American hegemony (which may or may not be equally theocratic). As I've said before, there's nothing conservative about any of that, no matter how hard conservatives try to justify themselves.
A sign of the times: A recent poll conducted by Democracy Corps, a Democratic organization, shows Bill Clinton ahead of George W. Bush in a hypothetical 2008 presidential election by the substantial margin of 53 to 43 percent.
The real center of American politics, not the false center mythologized by the right-wing media, is there for the taking, and, with Bush ever more exposed for what he is and what he stands for, Democrats are poised to move back in, as they did in '92. But it won't be easy. Moderates take comfort, but don't back down.
3 Comments:
I hope that you're right, Michael. I have wondered occasionally (esp. after Schaivo) when the american public would be roused from its post9/11 slumber and start to call Bush on some of his more intrusive and hegemonic policies. I have always understood one of the differences between anericans and canadians to be the american resistance to govewrnment intervention in their daily lives and personal decisions (little government vs. big government). This may mean a few more holes in their social safety net but it has also meant strong individualism and a check on government power (here is where canadians might learn something...) BUt the interference of government, and specifically of George Bush, during the Schaivo hubub seemed over the top - government passing legislation specifically aimed at obstructing the individual's right to choice (o, maybe abortion and same-sex marriage fits here, too...) and interfering in the dynamics of the all-important family unit. This plus the government control of the fear button via vague security 'alerts' and inflammatory presidential addresses indicated to me that the american government was getting very big indeed - perhaps too big for its britches if you will. I didn't think that the joes and janes public would stand for much more of that, esp. in light of ongoing problems facing the Bush government. Bush's continued and growing attachment to the theocratic evangelists is making him look more and more like a cult leader and less and less like a leader of the people. And yeah, why aren't we hearing about all the great victories and accomplishments in the Middle East? And WHERE IS Osama Bin Laden, anyway?
By Unknown, at 7:57 AM
thanks this is very beautiful article and url
hadise
cam balkon
film izle
film indir
vadinin sesi
uydu frekans
Lida Dai Dai Hua Jiao Nang Seo Yarışması
Küresel ısınma
barış demir
By BRSMAN, at 3:43 PM
thanks.
söve mantolama pencere sövesi siding söve fiyatları söve resimleri söve nedir söve firmaları söve kaplama söve uygulamaları strafor söve prekast söve söve imalatı dış cephe söveleri söve sistemleri hazır söve dekoratif söve hazır söve mantolama dış cephe mantolama dış cephe süsleme söve tasarımı söve dekorasyon siding söve çeşitleri
ısı yalıtım
söve
boya
dış cephe söveleri
söve fiyatları
söve imalatı
söve kaplama
söve nedir
söve sistemleri
söve firmaları
pencere sövesi
dış cephe süsleme
hazır söve
siding fiyatları
siding
amerikan siding
kartonpiyer söve
cephe söveleri
söve harcı
dekoratif söve
plastik boya
dış cephe boyaları
antibakteriyel boya
astar boya
dış cephe macunu
saten boya
dış cephe boyaları
ahşap koruyucu
boya
söve
dış cephe
mantolama
dış cephe kaplama
boya
izolasyon
e-ticaret
By söve, at 5:53 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home