Racism and euphemism: The exclusionary candidacy of Hillary Clinton
TNR's Michael Crowley makes a good point in response to the whites-vote-for-Hillary argument coming from the Clinton campaign (and from the candidate herself):
It's definitely uncomfortable to hear her say it, but if Hillary thinks white Americans won't elect a black president, is it so transgressive for her to say it out loud? Everyone in politics and media has been having this conversation for more than a year now. If anything it seems better than reliance on cutesy euphemisms like "working class" or "electability." I'm willing to be convinced I'm wrong but I think it's worth considering this before the latest "race-baiter" pile-on gets underway in earnest.
As I said yesterday, a better justification for the continuation of her campaign is the credible argument that she remains a strong candidate with broad-based appeal: not just working-class whites, but women and Hispanics as well, not to mention much of the Democratic establishment. Obama has won more contests, more votes, more pledged delegates, and, since Super Tuesday back at the beginning of February, more superdelegates, and we must remember Obama's momentum-generating performance on Super Tuesday (when he more or less drew even with Hillary by outperforming her) and sweep of victories up until Pennsylvania, but Hillary, to be fair, has done well, too, posting victories from California and Arizona to Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, to New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts (and she would likely have won Florida and perhaps also Michigan).
But facts are facts, and Obama is ahead with what is an essentially insurmountable lead. It's possible, of course, that Hillary will bow out after a victory in West Virginia (May 13), or perhaps after a victory in Kentucky and a loss in Oregon (May 20). But it's also possible, as some insiders are suggesting, that she will fight it out not just through the remaining contests, which end on June 3, but until the convention -- unless, that is, there is a surge of superdelegates to Obama and/or the party leadership unites in demanding her withdrawal from the race.
The problem is, her arguments for staying in either aren't true (he wins one, I win one, it's close!) or are, as we are now seeing, based on race. The former is predictable political spin. The latter is deeply troubling.
While it is true that Obama has won and overwhelming majority of the black vote and that Hillary has won, in most states, a solid majority of the white vote, or rather of the white working-class vote, Obama's appeal has never been racial/racist. Rather, he has repeatedly called on Americans to address the country's racial, sexual, economic, and other divisions seriously so as ultimately to move beyond them and fulfill America's promise. His appeal is, in a word, inclusionist.
Hillary has been inclusionist, too, and her policy positions certainly are, but the whites-vote-for-me argument is decidedly the opposite.
Now, identity politics are at work here, I admit. Members of groups identify with and support candidates with whom they share what they deem to be their defining characteristics. Blacks support Obama, women support Hillary. Hispanics support Hillary, not Obama, but this may be because they don't identify with a black man or because they prefer Hillary's positions on issues like immigration or because Bill has a long and positive history with the Hispanic community. Educated and affluent men support Obama, not Hillary, but this may be because Hillary has presented herself throughout this campaign as a (faux) populist, while Obama seems to be the more educated (though Hillary is certainly highly educated and highly affluent -- it's a matter of perspective).
But do working-class whites prefer Hillary to Obama because of her (faux) populist positions on the gas tax, guns, and other such issues? Or because he seems like a coastal elitist who appeals to university students and addresses issues and engages voters with maturity and intellect? Or because he seems to be out-of-touch when he makes "bitter" comments about small-town and rural voters (even if what he said, however artlessly, was the truth)? Surely the preference isn't based on policy, given that, on policy, the two are very much alike?
(Gasp!) Could it be that working-class whites prefer Hillary because she's... white?
Which is not to say, of course, that all working-class whites are racist, or that such racial considerations, of which they may or may not even be aware, determine how they vote. And yet, the very term "working-class white" is a loaded one. On the surface, it seems to mean whites who work for a living and are somewhere in the middle and lower-middle class, as well as whites who are working poor or somewhere in the class between poverty below and the middle class above. (In short, those with blue collars.) But it also means uneducated or poorly educated whites: Hillary does extremely well with voters who do not have a college degree (and who do not have even less than that).
But this isn't just about working-class whites, it's about whites generally. Hillary wins more of them than Obama does. And, of late, this fact has become one of her core arguments. Once an inclusionist, like Obama, she has, in defeat, become an exclusionist: "Whites support me; therefore, I will stay in the race."
I'm not making this up. In her interview with USA Today yesterday, Hillary argued that she has "a much broader base to build a winning coalition on." However, as evidence, she referred to an AP article that "found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me... There's a pattern emerging here." (Her chief strategist, Geoff Garin, made a similar argument in a conference call yesterday.)
Yes, there is a pattern emerging, and it's Hillary and her campaign making more and more of a racial case for her candidacy. And it's not just about whites generally, it seems, but about uneducated and poorly educated working-class whites. And what she herself is saying, as Crowley points out, is that these whites, or at least many of them, simply will not vote for Obama.
Now, let's not go too far with this. It's not clear that Hillary is saying that these whites would never vote for him, that it is racism (or, less malignantly, racially-motivated identity politics) that is determining their preferences. But, as a part of her overall electability argument, this latest racialization of the race would seem to suggest something like that: "Whites -- or, more specifically, some whites, and a lot of them -- are supporting me in ever-increasing numbers and won't vote for him; therefore, I will stay in the race and continue to make the case that I can win in November and he can't. I won't get into why they won't vote for him, but you can draw your own conclusions."
But -- and this question must be asked -- why? Why do these whites support her and not him? To what extent is (white) racism propelling Hillary's campaign? Yes, there are surely racists among Obama's black supporters, just as there are surely racists among Hillary's Hispanic supporters, and so on, but it is Hillary who is bringing this up, and she is doing so with respect to working-class whites who simply will not vote for Obama.
So enough with the euphemisms. Enough with the coded demographics. (Remember the Seinfeld episode where Elaine thinks she may be dating a black man and he thinks she's Hispanic? Enough with the "should we be talking about this?" avoidance of one of America's most divisive problems.
Let's have it out. Hillary, what exactly are you saying?
Labels: 2008 election, 2008 primaries, Barack Obama, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, racism
16 Comments:
出会いサイト★業界no.1★圧倒的登録数で催促近距離アポが可能出会いサイト!素人獲得数も、広告部数も業界最多!"
By
Unknown, at 11:20 PM
自律神経失調症・障害者をたった3ヶ月で克服したマル秘テクニックを紹介します!障害者ネイティブによるスピーディな授業はまさに圧巻の
By
Unknown, at 11:20 PM
国際協力ユーザーの皆さまが大手ECサイトで商品をご購入される際、グリーンクリックを経由していただくだけでECサイトから支国際協力。グリーンクリックを利用することで、商品の購入価 格が変わったり、寄付の
By
Unknown, at 11:20 PM
成長ホルモン
婚約指輪
障害者
結婚相談所 東京
国際協力
結婚指輪
浮気調査
アスクル
By
Unknown, at 11:21 PM
群馬 ハウスメーカー
埼玉 ハウスメーカー
盲導犬
治験
出産祝い
クレジットカード決済
24そんぽ24
自動車保険
自動車保険 比較
By
Unknown, at 11:21 PM
アクサダイレクト
インプラント
ショッピングカート
東京 ホームページ制作
不動産投資
埼玉 不動産
三井ダイレクト
カラーコンタクト
カーボンオフセット
コンタクトレンズ
知多半島 温泉
知多半島 旅館
ゼネラリ
松山市 不動産
賃貸
不動産
不動産投資
岡山 不動産
By
Unknown, at 11:22 PM
クレジットカード 現金化
不動産
インプラント
派遣
データ復旧
コンタクトレンズ
不動産
投資
FX
アフィリエイト
キャッシング
toefl
パソコン自作
By
Unknown, at 3:16 AM
美容整形Job!美容医療業界への就職・転職なら業界に特化した「美容整形Job!」にお任せ下さい"。美容整形に携わるドクター専門プロフサイト 美容の杜モバイル QRコード
By
Unknown, at 3:16 AM
不動産ゲットは不動産情報 投資マンション情報や東京都 不動産、東京 不動産の賃貸,売買物件検索仲介なら不動産ゲットへ。
By
Unknown, at 3:16 AM
FX、外国為替取引はじめるなら、新東京シティ証券の『為替マーケット』。最新FX情報を手に入れてリスクの少ないFX取引!仮想トレードでの外国為替無料体験も。
By
Unknown, at 3:17 AM
引越業界No.1クラスの安さと安心。お客様にあった様々なプランをご用意。秘密厳守なので単身女性も安心のキング引越センター
By
Unknown, at 3:17 AM
マンション 買取 1戸建て 査定 1戸建て 買取 SEO対策 福岡 賃貸 車買取 自動車保険 バイク買取 美容整形 労働問題 収益物件や不動産売却などにはマンション査定と土地売買と1戸建て売却が含まれる。 物件探しは広島 不動産 岡山 不動産 松山市 不動産 香川県 不動産 徳島 不動産 高知 不動産 高松 不動産をフルカバーしてます大手で 和歌山 富山 滋賀 石川 山梨 新潟 沖縄 大分 鹿児島 宮崎 熊本 高知
By
Anonymous, at 12:59 AM
不動産 投資 新築マンション インプラント 広島 引越し マンション 売却 不動産 査定 不動産 売買 広島 賃貸 システム開発 土壌汚染 クチコミ 土地 買取 不動産会社 ホームページ制作 賃貸 長野不動産富山不動産石川不動産福井不動産愛知不動産岐阜不動産三重不動産兵庫不動産滋賀不動産奈良不動産和歌山不動産鳥取不動産島根不動産山口不動産徳島不動産香川不動産愛媛不動産高知不動産佐賀不動産長崎不動産大分不動産宮崎不動産沖縄不動産 ホームページ制作 東京 原油 賃貸
By
Anonymous, at 2:37 AM
不動産 買取 広島市 インプラント 不動産 賃貸 収益物件 マンション 売買 土地 売却 札幌 不動産 仙台 不動産 大阪 不動産 横浜 不動産 名古屋 不動産 福岡 不動産 京都 不動産 埼玉 不動産 千葉 不動産 静岡 不動産 神戸 不動産 浜松 不動産 堺市 不動産 川崎市 不動産 相模原市 不動産 姫路 不動産 岡山 賃貸 明石 賃貸 鹿児島 不動産 北九州市 不動産 熊本 不動産 投資 土地 査定 口コミ 青森不動産北海道不動産岩手不動産宮城不動産秋田不動産山形不動産福島不動産群馬不動産栃木不動産茨城不動産山梨不動産新潟不動産プレジデント
By
Anonymous, at 2:37 AM
静岡 一戸建て
静岡 注文住宅
ブランド品 買取
インプラント
家具付 賃貸
東京 インプラント
パーティー
矯正歯科 名古屋
結婚相談所 東京
By
Anonymous, at 11:39 PM
オークション バイク 美容 インプラント 札幌 インプラント 美容外科 インプラント 大阪 インプラント 東京 インプラント 福岡 弁護士 美容院 結婚式 英会話 エステサロン グルメ 東京 グルメ ホテル 探偵 口コミ 口腔外科 インプラント 治療 広島 インプラント インプラント 口コミ 大阪 インプラント インプラント費用 東京 インプラント インプラント 歯科 塾 広島市 賃貸 税理士 転職 ラブホテル 自転車 ネイルサロン エステサロン 探偵 ペットショップ リフォーム 司法書士 歯科 審美歯科 リサイクルショップ 興信所 探偵事務所 探偵 興信所 浮気調査 探偵 浮気 占い 中古車
By
Anonymous, at 11:39 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home