Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Michelle Malkin is a dangerous idiot

By Michael J.W. Stickings

I can barely bring myself to post on this, mostly because I don't want to waste my time thinking about the mad, mad ravings of Michelle Malkin, but here goes:

As Heraclitus mentioned earlier, some conservatives are already responding to the Virginia Tech shootings with their typical brand of bloodthirsty insanity, and it should come as no surprise whatsoever that Malkin is leading the way. In this grotesque piece published at RealClearPolitics, she claims, with all attendant hyperbole, that "American colleges and universities have become coddle industries". Students are being protected "from hurtful (conservative) opinions" and "vigorous intellectual debate," while "Big Nanny administrators" are "allowing mob rule for approved leftist positions".

Now, I was rather critical of speech codes and the like when I was an undergraduate at Tufts -- and I wrote extensively on how higher eduction was giving way to social engineering and therapeutic soul-searching as an op-ed columnist for The Tufts Daily -- but this is patently ridiculous. It's the same old propaganda from the right, a self-serving assault on an imaginary PC paradise that exists only in their warped minds.

But my point here isn't to defend liberal education -- and institutions of American higher education -- from such ignorance and stupidity.

Malkin argues not just that students are not being taught how "to defend their beliefs" but that, rather more generally, "our higher institutions of learning stoke passivity and conflict-avoidance". And by this she means not just intellectual passivity but physical passivity as well. Which is to say, students are neither being taught how to stand up for themselves nor being allowed to stand up for themselves.

This brings us to the Virginia Tech shootings. Malkin asks: "What if just one student in one of those classrooms had been in lawful possession of a concealed weapon for the purpose of self-defense?" Yes, that's right, Malkin's twisted argument comes down to support for the possession of concealed weapons on college campuses: "Enough is enough, indeed. Enough of intellectual disarmament. Enough of physical disarmament. You want a safer campus? It begins with renewing a culture of self-defense -- mind, spirit and body. It begins with two words: Fight back."

Malkin supports intellectual armament -- for conservatives only, of course; she is no proponent of the sort of liberal education that truly empowers us to turn our heads from the shadows on the cave walls to the light above -- but her explicit focus here is armament in the more literal sense. In response to a violent act, she wants college students to carry concealed weapons around campus and into classrooms -- and to use them. For her, as for others like her, more guns mean more safety. Do I even need to point out what's wrong with this line of thinking? Just imagine a college campus -- just imagine a society, Malkin's perfect world -- where everyone is carrying a concealed weapon. Would you trust your classmates? Would you feel safer? Would not any confrontation be occasion for a shooting?

This is truly one of the ugliest and most loathsome things I have ever read. I call Malkin a dangerous idiot, as I have others before her, but that epithet hardly does her justice. She spews reprehensible opinions into the public space, and I can only conclude from this that she herself is a reprehensible human being.

What else to call someone who advocates a culture of killing?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

49 Comments:

  • Yes, but this was downright sane compared to some of Malkin's other creepy rants. Her defense of the imprisonment (I hate the gentle word "detained"---it sounds like someone being slightly inconvenienced) of a whole group of people simply based on their skin color was grotesque. It would've rightly been condemned as Nazi-like had it been written by a white person. Frankly, these sick, sick people scare me a hell of a lot more than Al Qaeda.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:27 AM  

  • I believe she's simply regurgitating the NRA's position and it's an opinion that's been offered on many occasions by their disciples including the Columbine shootings and even the Amish school incident.

    Although I don't advocate such silliness, it may be worth looking at places where concealed weapons permits are common - like Florida, where the murder rate has declined steadily since the 80's. The NRA types will assure you that it's because more of us have guns in our pockets after permits were allowed in the late 80's, but others will cite the general decline in shootings elsewhere.

    If you can tolerate a bit of amateur and ad hoc "freakonomics" there may be evidence that legal carry permits really don't make as much of a difference, one way or another as either side claims. Very few people who qualify to own and carry arms; who go through the training and fingerprinting, go on rampages.

    The number of firearm offenses committed by legal permit holders in Florida is so small as to be statistically insignificant - a fraction of 1%, I think, but the difference I do think is noticeable is in the nature (but not the frequency) of road rage incidents. I don't see irate motorists getting out of their cars to "discuss" their opinions very often any more now that a large number of cars contain firearms.

    The Virginia shootist was obviously deranged to those who knew him and obviously should never have been allowed to buy a gun, but longer waiting periods and more thorough background checks or any of the things advocated by the Brady people would not have stopped someone who had no record. I do think that non-citizens should not qualify to buy firearms, but that wouldn't make much difference overall.

    My point, if there is any, is that there isn't much we can do to assure that nobody will go bonkers and shoot, gas, poison, bomb or burn numbers of people regardless of our gun policies. Look at how well they do with box cutters and fertilizer. In fact, back when you could buy handguns through the mail, there were fewer such incidents.

    Any free society has to accept personal risk and as removing all means of making mayhem as well as defending ones self is impossible and in the US, illegal, we may want to concentrate on other strategies - like paying attention when a teacher says a student is insane and violent.

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 9:35 AM  

  • you accuse Malkin of hyperbole then use a phrase like

    "This is truly one of the ugliest and most loathsome things I have ever read."

    come on

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:49 AM  

  • Your words, "What else to call someone who advocates a culture of killing?" Why a pro abortion Democrat Liberal, of course!! Those of your ilk have supported the deaths of 30 million babies. And you call us blood thirsty. I would go on but as they say "in a battle of wits, you are unarmed".

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:12 AM  

  • Malkin is an imbecile. College students are not "being taught to defend their beliefs"?? Excuse me, I rather thought the point of education was to find out, among other things, whether your beliefs were justified by any facts! Welcome to the Cave, you idiots...anyone else want to take a walk away from the shadows into some knowledgeable sunlight?

    Oh, and "Anon" above? That is called a "logical fallacy" to screech about dead fetus numbers to change the subject from conservative ilkage justifying dead people with "time on planet". Why is it conservatives love only the UNborn? Once someone pops out of a womb they seem to be just another bullet stopper.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:46 AM  

  • Malkin is correct. If sheep don't fight back they will continue to be slaughtered. The Liberal idea of not getting involved is killing children.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:57 AM  

  • I haven't read her piece. I don't suppose she mentioned how there might have been less bloodshed if Dubya and the GOP Congress hadn't allowed the limits on how many rounds can be in a semiautomatic's magazine to expire?

    By Blogger Edward Copeland, at 12:17 PM  

  • For far too long our generation has been taught that personal defense is wrong. As you so casually linked being a conservative to being bloodthirsty, we have been molded into passive idiots by a belief that a disarmed society is a safe society. How quaint - obsolete - and deadly.

    It is blatantly immoral not to fight for your life and the life of your community when it is threatened with extermination. For thousands of years, we have believed this basic truth.

    But the generation in charge today has turned this on it's head. Wounded by assassinations and Vietnam, they believe we should all crawl under our "blankies" and cower for safety, or look to an internationally-pure organization to bail us out in time.

    It only takes one to start a war or a massacre. To prevent the ability to do what is necessary to defend your life is immoral - and stupid. It is time to tell the cowards and blowhard to take a hike - it will be easy to do too - they won't defend themselves.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:24 PM  

  • The vitriol directed at Malkin in this post is sadly representative of mainstream leftist thought. Rational debate should rise above namecalling, but there can little interest in rational debate when overweening emotion drives commentary.

    It's not surprising that such a mindset believes "any confrontation" is going to result in normal armed people killing each other rather than behaving responsibly or defending the innocent from violent predators. Can we assume the author is also kept away from such potentially deadly weapons as paring knives and shoelaces for the same reason?

    And regarding speech codes, I wonder what his reaction to university education would be if college professors leaned 80/20 Republican rather than the other way around? I'm sure we'd hear screams of oppression and fascism and the need for ideological quotas in hiring.

    By Blogger Dave, at 1:17 PM  

  • Labrys, I was just answering the question. I see that you too are unarmed.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:19 PM  

  • The posts against MM once again prove that Liberals are immune to logic and reason preferring to weave an “ideological friendly” fantasy and then use coercion (ecclesiastical or governmental) to force adherence.

    The time has come to realize that Liberalism presents a 'clear and present' danger to individuals and our Republic.

    And act and vote accordingly.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 1:39 PM  

  • "dangerous idiot"
    "mad, mad ravings"
    "warped minds"
    "ignorance and stupidity"
    "bloodthirsty insanity"

    Great examples of the level of debate we get from the left. If you advocate self-defense you "advocate a culture of killing"??? Please!

    Sticklings, your head in planted firmly in the sand. The evidence is overwhelming that our institutions of higher education are run by left wing radicals.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:54 PM  

  • "our institutions of higher education are run by left wing radicals."

    Wow, I think this is where the Nazis started their purge in Germany too. Way to keep that torch burning. I guess it is easier to start the book bonfires that way. :shrug:

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:18 PM  

  • Isn't it amazing how both sides seem to drip venom in their arguments but completely miss the point.

    A culture of self-defense is different than a culture of violence. If ten students had dogpiled on the guy and five of them killed in the process saving the remaining 20, they would be heroes, even if the shooter ended up dead.

    It's not the means, it's the attitude. If 30 people hear gunfire and all of them take cover until the shooting is over, that's not productive behavior. We won't say a word against those who cower waiting for the crisis to be over, but we raise heroes above everyone else. A hero is someone who does what's necessary in a crisis. Why should teaching our children to do what's necessary be wrong or inappropriate?

    Malkin is a stupid jerk, but then so to is anyone who thinks self-protection is a sin, or is somehow beneath us. I don't know the whole story about the shootings. I doubt anyone will for some time, but I do know that 30 people died, and the one who killed them was only one man.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:17 PM  

  • Hey look - sheep in Anonymous wolves' clothing. Pathetic.

    Well done, whoever you are. Needs to be right alongside that loon's ravings.

    By Blogger LT, at 3:24 PM  

  • Right on Michael. That miserable excuse for a human being Malkin, is simply hit trolling with that tripe. I can't fail to notice her avid supporters believe in her so much, they're afraid to identify themselves.

    I do have to say however, that I don't think banning guns is a solution. However, if we could figure out a way to ban Malkin and her merry hatemongers, we could go a long way towards restoring a civil society.

    By Blogger Libby Spencer, at 3:27 PM  

  • What a crock of anonymous mierda.

    Does refusing to acknowledge the difference between fertilized egg cells, embryos and "children" make one a conservative, or a lying sack of shit who hates freedom, reason and truth? 30 million children my ass - it's a lie.

    Intelligent discourse? It died in the US when the Republicans gained power; telling the idiots, anarchists and nutjob losers their ideas were really in the mainstream and it was those eggheads with three digits in their IQ's who were keeping the "Volk" down on the farm. It died in the vicious avalanche of hate radio that made any sign of intellect as suspicious as a hooked nose was to a Nazi.

    In fact it's people like the anonymassholes, Jesocrats and holy whores of hatred above who make me a supporter of gun rights. You don't stop a mad dog with words and if it takes force to put an end to what remains of their assault on American liberty, American values and American culture, I'm all for it. It took blood and sacrifice to make this a liberal Republic and if it takes more blood to keep it that way under an onslaught of old-time, old-world superstition and repression, so be it.

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 3:28 PM  

  • "In fact it's people like the anonymassholes, Jesocrats and holy whores of hatred ..." There is so much hatred in those words that you might want to spend a bit of time in front of the mirror reciting them. That you can't hear it when you type it says volumes.

    By Blogger vanderleun, at 3:37 PM  

  • Its truly amazing how quickly people forget what college is like, as believe many of Malkin's supporters here have. There is not a thing wrong with personal self-defense, if you're talking about martial arts like judo or aikido. But do you really think it wise to allow guns to be freely accessible among stressed out, newly on their own, rampantly experimental hormonal college students???

    In the tragedy we've all witnessed, 30+ people have lost their lives at one time. Can you guarantee that having concealed carry legal on campus well in advance of this would have reduced the casualty number? Or for all campuses nationwide? One incident here, one accident there, one disgruntled, hyper-stressed student who just happened to have a gun for personal protection in a fit of rage and hormones decided to take his/her frustrations out on someone because they can. I don't care how well trained they are in operating a handgun (and that's the most lethal thing they should EVER own).

    This is all worst case scenario, but entirely possible, just as this incident was. As anyone who has actually attended college will say, "college is not the real world." Any self-defense training any of these students may have had likely went out the window in a moment of instinctual panic. And its entirely possible there are students who attempted to stop this maniac, and paid for it with their lives.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:39 PM  

  • "Isn't it amazing how both sides seem to drip venom in their arguments but completely miss the point."

    .....

    BTW. That was my post. My name is William Grant. I'm not a Conservative or Liberal. I don't vote Democrat or Republican because they're both idiots and liars. I don't believe in gun control as the liberals would have it or free ownership as the NRA and most of the conservative right would have it. I don't believe in abortion but I don't think it's any of the governments business

    And I think anyone who tries to tell me who I support from the content of that one post is an idiot. You want to know what I think? Ask me. Otherwise, you don't know me, and you proclaim your ignorance by behaving as if you do.

    http://community.livejournal.com/floatingbadger/

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:40 PM  

  • Edward,

    I can change magazines with my Beretta 92 in about 3 seconds without effort. It's really a questionable conclusion to say that a ten round magazine instead of 15 would have saved any lives - if the Glock even takes a 15.

    The ban was 100% totally ineffective in the first place as there were so many millions of "pre-ban" magazines stockpiled and available through any catalog that the effort was completely futile. It wasn't passed to accomplish anything but only to allow legislators to say they passed a "gun bill"

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 3:40 PM  

  • Excellent post, Michael.

    By Blogger Kathy, at 3:47 PM  

  • Let's get it the right way around Gerard. You don't counter my argument or anyone's argument by telling me I'm full of hate. If I'm angry, it's because of the lies, misrepresentations, wars, thefts and erosions of liberty that are the result of the Republican ascendancy.

    Of course I'm angry that people are ruining my country and acting sanctimonious about it. I'm angry at the republican party and it's supporters because of the economic policy, the military policy and the erosion of liberty. I'm angry because of their support of incompetence and corruption. I'm angry at the lies. Why would I not be angry and how does my dislike of people I consider to be criminals and enemies of freedom make them defensible? If your attempted put down were universally applied, all criminals would be innocent because we get angry at their crimes.

    The "you must be wrong because you're angry" argument should have been left in the kindergarten playground where it originated. It's just another distraction from the crimes of the Republicans and it doesn't work.

    By Blogger Capt. Fogg, at 3:51 PM  

  • Welcome, wingnuts! It's always a pleasure to have you here with us.

    Great points, Capt. Fogg. You, too, Labrys.

    Libby: I'm not necessarily in favour of a ban on gun ownership. I do think there are limits to appropriate gun control. What I cannot support is the possession of concealed weapons.

    Tom: You could at least spell my name correctly.

    Thank you, Kathy.

    Am I unarmed? I would say I'm armed like Philopoemen. Right, Heraclitus? (Sorry, this is an insider Straussian thing -- read Chap. 14 of Machiavelli's The Prince.)

    By Blogger Michael J.W. Stickings, at 4:04 PM  

  • MJWS: Your critics are right to call you on the hyperbolic language in your post. IMO you'd be stronger if you let some of the more extreme adjectives go and made your point.

    I am for limited CCW, and I don't see why uni campuses would be an exception. The main issue for me is that the CCW holder meet a high standard of qualification and competence. That's a reasonable requirement.

    My main objection to Malkin's rant, however, is how facile it is in its equivalence of "intellectual disarmament" and "physical disarmament". Huh? It's one of those false narratives that ties all of one's various political beliefs into a single narrative of the decay of western civilization (or American society).

    In a contest of political viewpoints, it's tempting to define all of the ills of society in terms most denigrating to your opponent and tie each discrete ill together to create a massive conpiracy of thought, and then portray yourself as the truth-telling bell-ringing voice in the wilderness. Malkin indulges in this (as quite a few people on both sides do, to be fair), and indulges, and indulges... It's a dead end argument, but irrational enough to be immune to meaningful examination.

    By Blogger Bennett, at 4:27 PM  

  • Capt. Fog, the more you write the more I like.

    Great post, Sticklings!

    By Blogger creature, at 4:58 PM  

  • Love all the wingnuts here who don't seem to understand the glaring, gaping hole in their "logic."

    These righties don't understand that legal weapons purchased under current law were used in an act of terrorism in Blacksburg. None of them seem to want to admit this inescapable reality: these killings were made possible only by the easy access to firearms enjoyed by this killer, and these killings were made easier by the elimination of the ban on high-capacity clips under the Bush Administration and the Republican congress.

    They enabled terrorism, and they can't rationalize that away. So they complain about using hyperbole when discussing the always-understated Malkin.

    Sigh--it scares me that people who think like this have been running the country (into the ground) for over six years.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:01 PM  

  • Anon (5:01):

    But if someone commits a similar act tomorrow, using illegally obtained guns, then the right will parade that fact around just like you are doing here.

    Is that really what you want in the place of rational debate? Picking through facts like vultures and trading rhetorical points each time some nutjob goes off the handle? Can either side really win that way?

    By Blogger Bennett, at 5:08 PM  

  • Michael, what is going on here? What happened to the thoughtful writing from you that I'm used to seeing and respecting, even though I may disagree?

    By Blogger Sister Toldjah, at 8:03 PM  

  • S.T.: I know you and I often disagree, but I do know the respect is mutual. And, as you know, I am not one to throw such language around lightly. Whether it's you or Ed Morrissey or James Joyner or any number of others on the right, I have made an effort to engage in dialogue and debate.

    But Malkin's argument is, I think, outrageous. To suggest that such violence could be either avoided or dealt with if everyone were armed is -- and I can think of no better word for it -- crazy. And to think that a college campus, or society as a whole, would be safer if everyone were armed reflects a thoroughly debased view of human beings and of political community generally. Did I use strong language here? Sure. But I also give Malkin her say through numerous quotations, and I also, in the third to last paragraph, address her argument concretely.

    The fact is, I am not taking an extremist position -- I am not commenting on gun control (although I do support extensive gun control, if not an outright ban on gun ownership) -- and I am not simply telling Malkin to f-off.

    But I do find her views, here and elsewhere, repugnant. Certainly not the sort of conservatism for which I have respect. Consider her notorious defence of the treatment of Japanese-Americans during WWII. And to write this just two days after the massacre at Virginia Tech! Has she no shame? Has she no sense of perspective? Has she no feeling?

    It seems to me that in the face of such outrage a strong reaction is appropriate.

    By Blogger Michael J.W. Stickings, at 8:25 PM  

  • If you advocate self-defense you "advocate a culture of killing"???

    There's a BIG diffeence between advocating self defense and allowing 18, 19, and 20 year old kids to carry consealed weapons to class!

    That has to be the most dangerous idea since binge drinking.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:00 PM  

  • Consider her notorious defence of the treatment of Japanese-Americans during WWII.

    Did you know that people of Japanese ancestory were brought to the U.S. from several South American countries and imprisoned here until several years after the war?

    This is something that is never discussed in connection with the WWII internments.

    The big difference between the American citizens and those from S. America is that they weren't allowed to return to their homes. They were "repatriated" to Japan -- even third generation S. Americans. Our government gave them classes in Japanese culture so they could live in Japan.

    I wonder what Malkin would say about that.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:06 PM  

  • " Those of your ilk have supported the deaths of 30 million babies. And you call us blood thirsty"

    You'd think it 30 million people were murdered that there'd be some kind of armed insurrection to stop it wouldn't you?

    One wonders if people like anon lack the courage of their convictions. Or perhaps they really don't feel abortion=murder.

    By Blogger jollyspaniard, at 12:14 PM  

  • I like the propsect that was proposed on another post I read somewhere:

    What if several of the students had been carried legal concealed weapons? They hear gunshots, they pull out their 9's and start stalking the halls. Then one or the other spots a fellow student carrying their legal gun, also looking for the faceless shooter. Bloodshed ensues. I don't think we should ever assume that more guns = more safety.

    Sorry for anonymous post, I don't have either log-in account requested for this site.

    lurxst

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:11 PM  

  • She is an idiot... a big one at that. :)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:27 AM  

  • definatly agree with you.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:22 PM  

  • key is to look for solutions that can disable or even prevent harmful events & people without hurting others/innocents.

    NON-LETHAL WEAPONS perhaps?

    everything from silly string, foams, weird gun systems that are popping up in military research centers...invest in that!

    They're disabling, at least temporarily or may slow down, reduce and maybe even prevent would be violence not to mention they're relatively harmless...and in cases like VA Tech....if everyone used their non-lethal weapon accidently, it would be quite alright.

    name-calling and other tactics just doesn't do anything to help.....but while we're at it... Michell M. is an idiot!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:35 PM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:22 PM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:43 PM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:43 PM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:44 PM  

  • By Blogger Guardian, at 6:38 PM  

  • --
    ø¤º°`°º¤ø
    ,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,
    °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°
    °`°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°`°
    °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°
    ,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,
    ø¤º°`°º¤ø
    º°`°
    ثيمات


    ازياء 2009

    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات
    ثيمات








    توبيكات



    العاب
    العاب

    العاب ديكور اطفال صغار

    العاب
    العاب
    العاب بنات

    ثيمات
    ماسنجر messenger توبيكات توبك

    العاب البنات
    لعبة طبخ
    لعبة طهي الدجاج
    تزيين غرفة باربي
    ميك اب
    تيمون وبمبه
    لعبة البلياردو
    لعبة سونك
    الجاسوسات
    تزيين البنوتات الحلوات
    اكسسوارات باربي
    لعبة باربي
    ترتيب بيت باربي
    nice gallery
    العاب بنات

    العاب مطبخ


    http://rmooosh.net/vb/f60.html
    ثيمات n95, ثيمات ان 95/n95, ثيمات جوال , ثيمات n73 , ثيمات موبايل , برامج جوال 95, برامج جوال نوكيا , برامج جوالات , برامج جوال N73 , برنامج جوال , برنامج جوال N73,العاب جوال , العاب جوالات , العاب الجوال , العاب للجوال , العاب الثيمات


    برامج جوال نوكيا
    العاب n73
    ثيمات موبايل
    ثيمان ان 95
    ثيمان n70
    ثيمات ان 70
    ثيمات جديده
    ثيمات نوكيا
    ثيمات e65
    ثيمات منوعه
    ثيمات nokia
    ثيمات بنات
    ثيمات حلوه
    ثيمات رومانسيه
    العاب مطبخ
    ثيمات 2008
    ثيمات 2009
    الثيمات
    ثيمات new
    جديد الثيمات

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:45 PM  

  • http://www.0120128888.com/
    http://www.0120128888.com/t-tokyo.html
    http://www.auction-get.com/
    http://www.baike-get.com/
    http://www.beauty-1.info/
    http://www.beautyget.net/
    http://www.beauty-get.net/
    http://www.beautygets.com/
    http://www.beautyno1.net/
    http://www.beauty-pp.com/
    http://www.beautypp.net/
    http://www.bengosi-get.com/
    http://www.biyouin-get.com/
    http://www.buraidaru-get.com/
    http://www.english-get.com/
    http://www.esute-get.com/
    http://www.gourme-get.com/
    http://www.gourmet-get.com/
    http://www.hotel-pp.com/
    http://www.hi-get.com/
    http://www.implant-1.com/
    http://www.implantget.com/
    http://www.implant-hirosima.com/
    http://www.implant-no1.com/
    http://www.implant-p.com/
    http://www.implant-pp.com/
    http://www.implant-tokyos.com/
    http://www.inpuranto.biz/
    http://www.jyuku-get.com/
    http://www.kabekaido.com/
    http://www.keiri-get.com/
    http://www.kyujin-get.com/
    http://www.lovehotel-get.com/
    http://www.motorcycle-get.com/
    http://www.nail-get.com/
    http://www.no1-beauty.com/
    http://www.no1tantei.com/
    http://www.pet-get.com/
    http://www.reform-get.com/
    http://www.sihou-get.com/
    http://www.sika-get.com/
    http://www.sinbisika.info/
    http://www.siti-get.com/
    http://www.tanteiget.com/
    http://www.tanteino1.com/
    http://www.tantei-no1.com/
    http://www.tanteipp.com/
    http://www.tantei-pp.com/
    http://www.uranai-get.com/
    http://www.usedcar-get.com/

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:13 AM  

  • 搬家
    搬家
    搬家公司
    徵信社
    徵信
    彩妝造型
    新娘秘書
    票貼
    室內設計
    室內設計
    徵信
    徵信社
    外遇
    徵信
    徵信社
    外遇
    搬家
    搬家
    花蓮民宿
    花蓮民宿
    免費a片
    a片
    免費av
    色情影片
    情色
    情色網
    色情網站
    色情
    成人網
    成人圖片
    成人影片
    18成人
    av
    av女優

    情慾
    走光
    做愛
    sex
    H漫
    免費a片
    a片
    免費av
    色情影片
    情色
    情色網
    色情網站
    色情
    成人網
    成人圖片
    成人影片
    18成人
    av
    av女優

    情慾
    走光
    做愛
    sex
    H漫
    a片
    アダルト
    アダルト
    アダルトサイト
    アダルトサイト
    離婚
    抓姦
    外遇蒐證
    外遇抓姦
    外遇
    侵權
    仿冒
    應收帳款
    工商徵信
    Shade sail
    nike shoes
    水泵
    电动隔膜泵
    自吸泵
    离心泵
    磁力泵
    螺杆泵
    化工泵
    水泵
    电动隔膜泵
    自吸泵
    离心泵
    磁力泵
    螺杆泵
    化工泵
    水泵
    电动隔膜泵
    自吸泵
    离心泵
    磁力泵
    螺杆泵
    化工泵
    隔膜泵
    气动隔膜泵
    隔膜泵
    气动隔膜泵
    隔膜泵
    气动隔膜泵
    a片
    成人網站
    成人影片
    寵物用品
    情趣用品
    情趣用品
    MBA
    在职研究生
    在职博士
    補習班
    花店
    花店
    補正下着
    中古車買賣
    貸款
    婚紗
    婚紗攝影
    補習班
    留學
    情色
    情色
    百家乐
    轮盘
    21点
    德州扑克
    百家乐系统
    真人娱乐场
    百家乐
    足球
    德州扑克
    电子游戏
    英格兰超级联赛
    德国甲组联赛
    意大利甲组联赛
    西班牙甲组联赛
    法国甲组联赛欧冠杯
    英超
    足球比分
    足球彩票
    体育彩票
    即时比分
    堆高機
    婚禮佈置
    宜蘭民宿推薦
    寵物用品
    情趣用品
    情趣用品
    坐月子
    植牙
    牙齒矯正
    租屋
    催眠
    房屋出租
    租房子
    xo醬
    牛軋糖
    牛嘎糖
    代償
    房屋貸款
    信用貸款
    失眠
    減肥
    眼鏡
    金門高梁酒
    變頻洗衣機
    票貼
    借款
    關鍵字廣告
    租車





    減肥
    眼鏡
    睡眠障礙
    憂鬱症
    躁鬱症
    減重
    瘦身
    中醫減肥
    台北中醫減肥
    台中中醫減肥
    高雄中醫減肥
    產後減肥
    下半身減肥
    下半身瘦身
    高雄眼鏡
    屏東眼鏡
    名牌眼鏡
    太陽眼鏡
    隱形眼鏡
    鐵氟龍
    PTFE
    中壢花店
    林口花店
    南崁花店
    金莎花束
    歌倫比亞
    雞腳凍
    飲料加盟

    太陽餅
    月餅
    口袋秤
    度量衡
    吊秤
    吊磅
    電子秤
    磅秤
    口袋秤
    度量衡
    吊秤
    吊磅
    電子秤
    磅秤
    招牌製作
    招牌設計
    廣告招牌
    大圖輸出
    電腦割字
    招牌看板
    廢鐵
    廢銅
    廢不銹鋼
    廢電線
    廢鋁
    廢棄物
    廢電纜電線
    廢塑膠
    制服
    成衣
    戒指
    耳環
    項鍊
    對戒
    手鍊
    銀飾
    飾品
    對鍊
    護理之家
    台中花店
    考試
    塑膠箱
    塑膠容器
    工具箱
    物流箱
    拖板車
    自動倉儲
    倉儲設備
    自行車衣
    自行車背包
    自行車手套
    車衣
    債務更生
    債務清理
    法協
    蜂蜜
    蜂王乳花粉
    農產品
    草本膠囊
    促進新陳代謝
    排便順暢的方法
    體內環保
    塑膠射出
    塑膠製品
    塑膠箱籃
    物流塑膠箱
    休閒傢俱
    庭園圍籬

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:14 AM  

  • デリヘル情報とデリヘル検索の完全無料サイト:デリヘルDXデリヘルDXでは東京・池袋・新宿・歌舞伎町・大久保・渋谷・恵比寿・六本木・上野・秋葉原・大塚・鶯谷・日暮里・立川・吉祥寺・錦糸町、埼玉・西川口・ 熊谷・越谷・草加、神奈川・横浜・川崎、千葉・船橋・西船橋・栄町・本八幡・松戸の、素アダルトグッズ、アダルトグッズ激安、ネット最大級の品揃えのアダルトグッズショップです。圧倒的な取扱い商品数。欲しい商品が何でも揃います。他店に無い商品も多数取り扱っております

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:16 AM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:18 AM  

  • Osaka host
    clubs / Our host host club host club in Osaka. Host club champion, Miss popular cabaret club.
    Perfusion NOME, NOME related clubs, cabaret club, Osaka, host supper, MIX Bar, Shemale, pubs show host club, lounge, Kyoto, Kobe, Minami, Umeda, Shinti Kita, 30, Nishinakazima, Sannomiya, Kansai, town, Kiya-cho, Kawaramachi, jobs in information, Miss KYABA, nightlife, drinking cups Kansai Club, Osaka, Kyoto club. Rear DVD uncensored DVD sales in the box at the bottom of each piece of fire-sale price of 285 yen!
    Rear DVD, uncensored DVD sales are at their ships off the top-secret security. Domestic quality DVD-R because I'm using a low-price is superb!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:18 AM  

  • By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:19 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home